About Whereabouts of my letter to the Nuremberg and Fürth news a few weeks ago I do not know but this morning an email from Weser Kurier was in my inbox. Am 30.3. I wrote in response to a article that ran on an Internet censorship a letter to the editor.
This letter is now intended for publication - which makes me very happy:
to the producing editor of the Weser-KurierUpdate 9/28/2009: According Weser Kurier my letter has been provided for publication. Whether he actually in the print edition, was white, I am afraid not, because I did not get any feedback from the editorial more.
Good day,
They wrote on 25.3. an article about the proposed Internet censorship
concerning child pornography. There you will require the constitution to change
that a censorship made possible. If you are not sure
that an opening can be used for censorship threaten democracy extreme -
which has been shown dramatically in the past and even today
, for example in China, is still happening?
claim that opponents of Internet censorship consider the Internet
legal vacuum. I can assure you that you are not counterfeiters
this presumption can.
precisely for this reason it can also be no censorship on the internet!
Prohibited Content, including, of course, images of abused children are
, have always been illegal and can be retrieved efficiently from the net without a
censorship - would have to Only the prosecutors
better trained and staffed.
that the perpetrators can be reached next show trials of child protection organizations
( http://www.carechild.de/news/politik/internetzensur_carechild_versuch_blamiert_deutsche_politiker_566_1.html )
also the locations of most servers - there are western countries where effective
prosecution would be possible!
Each of the censorship of an effective law enforcement prefers
must make are seriously concerned that if he wants to live in a democracy or an authoritarian society
. Opponents of censorship
plans have opted for democracy and contact
for it.
Sincerely, John
Schöck
0 comments:
Post a Comment