Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Darton Compound Bow Viper Review

The legality of the distribution of public service content

When downloading some content from the library of the first German long tendon introduced himself to me the question whether disclosure was permitted. By the appropriate program directors, I got quick reply: Dear Mr.
 Schöck, 

thank you for your e-mail and your interest in the First German Television.

are general, all our shipments copyright protected. The ARD is a consortium of public broadcasters of the Federal Republic of Germany. ARD to include nine regional radio stations. Their joint program is the first German television channel. All articles and broadcasts of the first produced by the national broadcasters. Therefore, the country's broadcasters the rights to the respective programs.

All are in radio and television broadcast is protected by copyright. Each recording of a radio and television broadcast on tape, video tape or DVD is a reproduction, which usually requires the consent of the author. An exception is the use for strictly private purposes. For (§ 53 paragraph 1 Copyright Act) allowed radio and television broadcasts are recorded and played back.
So it is only allowed to lend you your own copy to friends, of course, without demanding money. In "private" means only a legal use in the family and friends. Any other use requires a permit from the author. You may say for example your own copy will not reproduce and do not perform in public.

We hope to have you with this information on.

Sincerely
 Julia Janner 
Unfortunately, this statement is quite clear - Although that's a good thing, but the content is regrettable. Thus, it is not possible to citizens to get legally-funded content to the public.
my view there is definitely a need for improvement here, and howl when the private channels and would be "bankruptcy" scream. As whether it would make the majority of viewers to watch the charges and instead of [any afternoon show low levels] programs from the library. Since it is only us left our opinions known to do. So write letters, talk to friends and family about it and use the powerful media libraries.

Happy you!

PS: In the comments to my little how-to someone has recommended a program to download content from different libraries . I have not tested it yourself, it would, however, no one denied. Have fun and thanks for the tip.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Best Speakers For Vintage Reciever

happy new year 2010 adk

Sunday, December 27, 2009

How To Build A Chair Blue Prints

download from ARD media library

( Update : got video format)

The idiotic treaty on the public television (currently have some politicians who are good probably friends with the media bosses to excited about a planned iPhone application , So one need be surprised at anything) ARD, ZDF, may provide only seven days, etc. content on their websites. This often leads
to that what we have funded through its GEZ fees not at all look / listen-can. There is only the contents of the download time (and possibly redistribute - whether this is legal or not is still unknown to me, look forward to your comments).

allow as many to exercise their right to self-financed, media consumption, I post items for the ARD's instructions to save movies from the Media Centre.

  1. open side of the paper (where the video is playing)
  2. View Source (Firefox: Press Ctrl + U)
  3. After "/ * video urls * /" Search
  4. Here When you search for "" looks for the video size of the download you want (for example, is indicated with the sizes S, M and L).
    For example
    player.avaible_url ['flash media'] ['1 '] = "rtmp: / / vod.daserste.de/ardfs/mp4: videoportal/Film/c_110000/111576/format112596.f4v sen = M % & for E4rchenfilm = Web-S & clip = Snow White ";


    The" for = Web-S "means that it is the small video version. "Web for =-L" would be the large size.

  5. take off the part "/ Movie /" Video URL from the back of it, but only until the question mark ...
  6. adds ... http://video.daserste.de/videoportal/Film/ front of it and
  7. throws the URL into a download manager (eg Down them all)
  8. The videos are in Quicketime player playable
summary (ending mov.)
Part 1: http : / / video.daserste.de / video portal / Film /
Part 2: c_110000/111576/format112596.f4v

This gives the video URL: http://video.daserste.de/videoportal/Film / c_110000/111576/format112596.f4v

then created to best a torrent and shares the video with all the other fee payers, so not everyone has to carry so much effort just to the public TV to see.

download Enjoy movies and free!

PS: The first indications I got from this forum (and the article there purely made almost identical).

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Can You Buy Hair Color Rinses At Cvs

domestic policies of the Union

Now I've really got to be getting in writing. There are precisely rather than the coalition negotiations between the CDU, CSU and FDP. The fact that the FDP did
with her commitment to civil rights campaign, the Union was not so great. But what have since been many Union politicians are is incredible.

Hans-Peter Uhl (CSU):
" A reversal of the security laws of the grand coalition is not for us negotiable, a completely absurd idea . "
would be so strange that the CSU had to put in Bavaria dramatic losses, have won the liberals but solid? From the economic policies that are unlikely, because the CSU is no more for the expansion the welfare state as the FDP - and that people liked the economic crisis, which was produced by an unbridled market economy, then certainly not driven many voters to the Liberals
One should, Mr Uhl, also do not learn only from mistakes of others. . In the UK, such as has been noted both that video surveillance does not prevent violence, and that very anti-terror laws quickly, even on children at play or be used to meet quotas . What may have consequences for the individual citizen may be anyone's guess yourself. So not only
dismantling of mindless repression.

Volker Bouffier (Interior Minister of Hesse, CDU) notes it will "with the CDU and CSU no change of course " give .
that the Union is in a police state clinging to Enwicklung, although there are no threats to reele Germany (key word "international terrorism") and the crime has been decreasing - even in youth violence - Seems to me after this election result still illogical. Especially when you look at the declining voter turnout and the absolute vote for the Union.
The protests of tens of thousands of people, a petition with hundreds of thousands of supporters and even a party up against an expansion of the surveillance state ignores the stubborn politician. There's really no appropriate Kurswechel!

And finally, Roland Koch (CDU):
" In my view we are not good enough in monitoring "
Since he has of course absolutely right. Had it retention already given in the 90s, it would the CDU funding scandal over several million illegal political contributions - or with the arms suppliers Schreiber (former CSU) - have been much easier to prove. A few profiles Match movement here, because surveillance video and phone lists - hey presto all know how the wind is gone. Thanks SWIFT bank transfer data transfer even the Americans.

love Union, I am pleased indeed that you want to obtain the Pirate Party of new voters for the election 2013, but I would prefer we did not live in a police state. Could then again more people would choose (not that there were no other reasons not to do ...) and you would have not so much preservation of power politics run. A win-win situation for you and the citizens you represent.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Tater Tot & Cheddar Cheese Soup Recipe

Pirates: not single-issue party

On netzpolitik.org, Markus Bekedahl the day after the federal election of 2009 video commentary (along with Julia Seeliger by the Greens and the FDP Gerhart Baum - may please be Home Secretary again?) Published. He called the Pirate Party is, like many before him, a single-issue party making the only power politics would do.
As my personal commitment from the Pirates alone was raised only because all other subject areas (internal security and civil rights), I had to tell Mark and I wrote the following commentary:
Dear Mark,

a shame that you have the single-issue phrase you used. Why is not the case I want to show the following topics list of Pirates:

- Network Policy (neutrality, development, free access)
- Homeland Security, in particular the monitoring degradation (offline, online, by phone on a PC on cameras - everywhere)
- Copyright & free access to culture (both on the Internet and offline)
- Education (free access to education, knowledge, information)
- Economic and Development Policy (revised patent system - in particular seed, Life & Software)
- Civil Rights (eg privacy, may be partly elements of the topics listed here already there)

This list is still expanding, but I think that is already apparent here is that the pirates do not represent a theme, but use of a model to many areas.
these values can also be extended to other areas and still be able to develop a consistent policy with it, but if that is good and beneficial for the main targets of the pirates I am not yet clear.

I would be happy if you continue with our goals more nuanced manner - or should constitute a strong case was first referred to as everything on a single topic.

Regards, John


PS: In the election campaign, "I am pirate" addressed many of these issues. Not just "Internet freedom" or "network policy".

I'm curious how he will react and whether this distorted perception of the pirates in the media will change in the near future.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Watch Moviesthe Brent Corrigan Online And Free

scene with police violence displaces the meaning of the demo?

On 12 September was the demo in Berlin, "Freedom not fear". An international movement against the increasing surveillance and control of citizens. She is running great, the weather was good and there were many people there.

Unfortunately, you can read about it but nothing!

Why not? On the edge of the demo, there was unnecessary and disproportionate force by individual police officers. A really bad thing to be well informed thanks to many witnesses, and movies can. Well done!

But! Why we read for 24 hours is absolutely nothing else? I will damn reports, photos and political statements - not constantly the same scene from blaubehemdeten cyclists.

Yes, there are pigs - including the police - but please let our true goal of the politicians and people try to show the world that not surveillance is the right way to pursue. Meanwhile, there are

netzpolitik.org to a corresponding report :
Update 14.9. . Good!

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Good Cruising Spots In Manhattan

Internet, the area without law - not!

For data-Speicherung.de there is a very nice article about "The Tale of Internet legal vacuum". In particular, this paragraph says everything be borne in mind in order to expose mortise the crap that many politicians

unworldliness
In fact, it is arrant nonsense, the Internet is a legal vacuum, it was never one. All laws apply, and that has always been, of course, the Internet, and there are criminal offenses and are punished legally and factually. Think of the many processes of eBay ratings, over the defense sales contracts in online shops or warnings about alleged piracy. The Copyright Act also sanctioned piracy on the Internet, the general right to protection against online and offline advertising or other harassment, and the Penal Code also covers Internet scams and Internet libel. The Internet is not its own levies in force in self-contained world in which other laws legally, even if some of the present lack of practical experience may Sun The idea of expressing itself speaks about the Internet as such a construct so far for their complete ignorance of the world.

nurnoch remains to be hoped that in the next election some of these politicians get to see that we are finally to the people's representatives are not completely clueless.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Neck Gets Stiff As Day Goes On

three-step test to the Telemedia Act

At the Telemedia Act on compatibility checks to the Internet age. On Netzpolitik.org there was this one call as a user in the various places of public broadcasters to report to lobby for longer accessibility, free licenses and the elimination of the transmission cover.

I have done with this mail to all relevant bodies, for public law produced content should remain public - even after more than seven days!

Ladies and Gentlemen,

as contributors and users of the public media offer them I would describe my idea of a meaningful future of public service media in Germany and would be happy if this would find under the current three-step test into account.

- much longer availability of the content, so you can see, even after several weeks publicly funded content on the Internet. The best for ever!
- Free licenses and formats so that everyone can see and use the content - even more so to culturally valuable works by creating remixes.
- Send reference is no longer relevant in the Internet age. All material should be available be not only what has been given in the traditional media a slot. Created information and cultural heritage must be accessible to the citizens!
- Appealing presentation of content, preferably with subtitles for the hearing impaired and contextual information (tags, production and the release date, names of the performers / speakers, etc.).

Thank you very much, that they also respond to user requests. has

Each of interest that for example the issues of the day even after a couple of years are still available should participate. Please note that the deadline for ARD job ends on Wednesday! ZDF has a few weeks longer an open mailbox.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Belgian Waffle Krusteaz For One Guy

power locks Ausweitungsfoderungen

order to document for posterity as the censorship in Germany has kept river, when I take once a person who made the claims which the blocking of websites and what else was on significant events.

  • 10/01/2007: Wolfgang Schäuble (Federal Minister of the Interior, CDU) calls terrorist content, and more attributes to block
  • 27.08.2008: BKA-Chef Jörg Zierke calls obligation on ISPs to block child pornographic websites
  • 20.11.2008: Urusla "Zensursula" von der Leyen (Federal Minister for Family Affairs, CDU) encourages blocking child pornography sites attributes
  • 1/12/2008: After the request of the Hessian Ministry of Interior (under Volker Bouffier, CDU) will also foreign gambling sites be locked to protect the state monopoly
  • 27/01/2009: In the telecom package of the EU to copyright owners by Internet access barriers (block of access, not content) are protected
  • 12.2.2009: falls in the first parliamentary debate on power locks after 12 minutes, the word " Copyright "
  • March 2009: Dieter Gorny (chairman of the Federation the music industry will) power locks to protect intellectual property
  • 04/14/2009: The provider Vodafone / Arcor, German Telekom, Alice, cable and O2 Germany sign a "voluntary" commitment blocking child pornography websites
  • 06/05/2009: Dieter Wiefelspütz (SPD), expresses his thoughts in general websites with to criminal content block
  • 6.6.2009: Wolfgang Bosbach (Vice-Chairman of the Group CDU) wants only used child pornography
  • block 10.6.2009: Thomas Strobl (Baden-Württemberg CDU General Secretary) will "Killer Games" lock (which is so gemint: legal FPS)
  • 18/06/2009: Order of the network lock law in parliament by a grand coalition (CDU / CSU and SPD)
  • 06/20/2009: Hans-Peter Uhl (spokesman of the CDU / CSU parliamentary group) confirmed Block extension to computer games
  • 10/07/2009: will Romani Rose (Central Council of German Sinti and Roma) "hate sites" block can
  • 07/10/2009: Federal Power Act accepted locks with the help of the FDP and the Greens -led government
particular, the beginning of the whole debate shows that politics always blocking and deletion of hazardous or criminal had in mind.
is of course especially the Union throughout the course of the debate has repeatedly stressed that it was only about the blocking of child pornographic sites. Just kind of seem to have some members not quite understand it ...

state censorship Germany (Source: http://machtwort.andymacht.de)

Thanks for the censorship State Germany! Now it nurnoch then someone leaves the term Article 5 of the Basic Law abolished.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

How To Fix A Pottery Barn Lamp

Freedom Not Fear 2009

This year I will necessarily be at the Freedom Not Fear Demo 12th September in Berlin. Last year was I was in the scene yet unfortunately so far there, to have known enough about the modest early date, but the demo has now been approved and the date is.
I hope to see you!

you notice the date before with the help of Alexander Svensson on word field.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Controls With Pokemon Rom For Mac

telephone campaign against Internet censorship

Since the grand coalition next week, the second and possible 3rd also would discourage reading of the law to block websites in the Bundestag that is to say at the time the deputies of all our constituents believe in (friendly) clarity.
help secure it and that both SPD and Union have lost in the European election votes - if you do not penetrates with a good argument to the members, then you can still try to make them realize that the election can not be long in coming.


Netzpolitik.org So start a campaign to mobilize the "Internet Community":
order again to articulate our arguments and interests in the Bundestag inside we now embark on a banner event: most certainly be the Panini football collecting images to know. We have prepared a collection of collecting images with Bundestag deputies and will present a new image each day.


So calls and speak with members of your constituency or where to find ( at abgeordnetenwatch.de)!

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

What Song Was Played In Unleashed

The digital generation gap

In the last two days, published two articles commenting on the current debate and reaction to a smorgasbord of repressive domestic policies over the last few years to perfect.

first The generation C64 Strikes Back (Spiegel Online)

second federal government vs.. the Internet - the next level of escalation (Handelsblatt)

In summary one can say that the digital generation, that all who are with computers, mobile phones and the Internet, familiar and not prejudiced by the errant security policy of the government for years and more dissatisfied is. That
change very soon something clearly needs to settle this turmoil is the politicians but probably not quite clear.

I agree with Thomas Knüwer (item # 2) believe that the blind safety and delusions of control of the government will have consequences. But he puts it so well that I'll just quote:
The result is a huge gap between the Herschend and the self-Mastered-sentient. This can not and will not be at the long run. Exposes the government to continue their course, will happen. Whether it is the complete collapse of the turnout, the establishment of one or more new parties, a movement outside Parliament - I do not know. But it remains as it is today, I can not believe. Unless the elected officials finally realize that they should represent the people - and not fight.


EOL

Monday, May 11, 2009

Matlab Releases 14 Plp Generator

letter to the Nuremberg news

Update 15.5.
Dear Mr. Schoeck,

we were delighted to receive your letter to the editor. Thank you. Unfortunately, the site has not been sufficient to the large number of letters to also take into account only superficially.

Well I'm very excited to see what times are available with a variety of letters to print it tomorrow ... namely, so far there was no one in the newspaper.

---

In the news Nuremberg on Saturday, a short, neutral article on the success of the petition. Apart from a blind item of an editor several weeks ago I wrote in my newspaper otherwise not received any reports on the Internet Lock. Today
were found then two bottomless letters in the newspaper. One can only assume that the vote deliberately misinterpreted figures of the Family Ministry and a lock actually help someone. But the other one makes the same sweeping blow against everything that has to do with modern media, accused " killer games" to be intended to kill training and ends in a babble about the bad Television program. That such a letter will be published at all is horrible.

So here is my, hopefully better, letter to the problems of Internet blocking at last to bear in this newspaper:

It shocked me that will be published in the NN two letters from obviously uninformed readers, but the position against the planned Internet-lock remains undefended. In particular, Mr lights seems to prohibit all "the loving trend in the CSU, but even he has no expertise (there is exactly one computer game that the Army has been commissioned and is not particularly brutal, realistic or innovative) still thinks about that made. A computer game can be described as a weapon bankruptcy of the ignorance of the medium computer.
But more importantly, that child pornography has no place, it is agreed, without exception, all the critics of the locks. However, there has long been legal means to this site for all to take from the Internet and to delay not only viewing a half a minute - for so long it takes to round out its PC to the proposed barriers, what we are not even technology savvy needs.
That so no child is helped is obvious. Why the operator of these pages that are hosted mainly in western countries with a functioning law enforcement do not follow be, I can not understand completely.
The solution of the problem were that simple: remove all child-porn websites and arrested the operator. Then no one would have to be afraid before, not so unrealistic censorship. Already, Lobby representatives call for blocking foreign betting sites or computer game sites, there is the step to-government nature will not be far off.
And the abused children would actually helped if our Government can not campaign with her sorrow, but would punish the perpetrators.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Gay Cruising Areas Orlando

Stop!


Without further ado ...

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Cervical Polyp At 8 Weeks Pregnant

letter to the Weser Kurier on child pornography

About Whereabouts of my letter to the Nuremberg and Fürth news a few weeks ago I do not know but this morning an email from Weser Kurier was in my inbox. Am 30.3. I wrote in response to a article that ran on an Internet censorship a letter to the editor.
This letter is now intended for publication - which makes me very happy:

to the producing editor of the Weser-Kurier

Good day,

They wrote on 25.3. an article about the proposed Internet censorship
concerning child pornography. There you will require the constitution to change
that a censorship made possible. If you are not sure
that an opening can be used for censorship threaten democracy extreme -
which has been shown dramatically in the past and even today
, for example in China, is still happening?
claim that opponents of Internet censorship consider the Internet
legal vacuum. I can assure you that you are not counterfeiters
this presumption can.
precisely for this reason it can also be no censorship on the internet!
Prohibited Content, including, of course, images of abused children are
, have always been illegal and can be retrieved efficiently from the net without a
censorship - would have to Only the prosecutors
better trained and staffed.
that the perpetrators can be reached next show trials of child protection organizations

( http://www.carechild.de/news/politik/internetzensur_carechild_versuch_blamiert_deutsche_politiker_566_1.html )
also the locations of most servers - there are western countries where effective
prosecution would be possible!

Each of the censorship of an effective law enforcement prefers
must make are seriously concerned that if he wants to live in a democracy or an authoritarian society
. Opponents of censorship
plans have opted for democracy and contact
for it.

Sincerely, John
Schöck
Update 9/28/2009: According Weser Kurier my letter has been provided for publication. Whether he actually in the print edition, was white, I am afraid not, because I did not get any feedback from the editorial more.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Airbrush Tanning Slogans

letter concerning child pornography on the Internet

This morning I open my Fürther messages and prompt me jumping an opinion (by Dieter Schwab) on page 2, entitled "Signal against child pornography" in the eye ( online version call )
The statements in it are simply wrong so I just had to write a comment. Let's see if he published is ...

Concerning "signal against child pornography" by Dieter Schwab, on 26.03.2009

with the request for publication, as in the current article were presented false facts.

Dear Mr. Schwab,

basically your belief is correct. Child pornography is bad and the abuse of children must be prevented at all costs. It is therefore imperative that discussions on Internet censorship with facts and not propaganda to lead the family and the Interior Ministry.

is completely correct and logical your call for the capture of the perpetrators. They claim that producers and distributors of child pornography for German Sit authorities reach abroad. This is factually incorrect. The significant majority of child pornography sites on existing lists of marks (Sweden, Denmark, Australia) is on U.S., European and especially German servers. The criminal reach of the operator of this site is guaranteed and a shutdown of illegal content easily available (as in the remainder of the child protection body care child, www.carechild.de , showed impressive three weeks ago )
Then you claim that the censorship model the Scandinavian countries had successfully established. Call it successfully, even if just on the filter lists 1% illegal sites are listed, but the rest is blocked and thus legally wrong? About the value of the pages you do not discuss, it is simply wrong to block legal content and that this in all countries, a censorship infrastructure have happened is a sad fact.
Furthermore, you can appeal by Ms Zypries on a sound legal basis can not understand. Are you aware can be the filter of the entrance to what? A government agency would have the power to remove any page for German citizens from the visible web - and you claim that constitutional concerns are not appropriate? I would be glad if more politicians with a would give such a backbone to restrain the progress of repressive laws. Also thank the providers must be said that they do not just jump on the Zensurzug. All Internet users should notify their providers that they terminate their contract in case of illegal censorship in order to push forward the constitutional process.
Finally, you claim that the proposed filter method would not work around for everyone. I do not think it particularly complicated a number of twelve points in the settings of the Web browser type in - because that would be quite sufficient with the proposed DNA-blocking.

The so-called market for child pornography, which is now long no longer conducts over the Internet, will not shrink through filters. Children can not thus protected from abuse. It is absolutely incomprehensible that the government wants to create a censorship infrastructure to consider the prosecution of the perpetrators rather than as a top priority!


Sincerely, John
Schöck

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

How To Makea Tech Deck Surfboard

of the outcome by "voting machines"

The Federal Constitutional Court decided that voting machines are in their current form is not in accordance with the Constitution. That's good. Why?

voting machines are not a bad thing. If they are placed properly, so open, of any verifiable and understandable.

Until now, however, every use of voting machines, whether in Germany or the United States, problems. They ranged from unlawful storage in the home on display too small to counting problems.

The future is of course the electronic voting, but until we are ready first have to show the politicians that they have understood that electronic voting is not the simplification of electoral fraud, but to simplify the electoral process - are used - with the same quality.

Other voices:

Sunday, March 1, 2009

High Cervix 1 Week Before Period?

Open letter to the Confederation of displaced

to dispute Erika Steinbach

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Ms. Steinbach is not the victim of a "national media campaign or " mass psychosis " , as stated in the BdV press statement, but disqualified by their policy for the Board of Trustees and the mission of reconciliation. Mrs. Steinbach to waive either or show up to learn, for example, by the following statement:

first "The agreements with Poland are closed and binding, so my resistance belong to the contracts of the past. Today, I am glad that Poland and Germany agreed on the boundaries, they are permeable and the opposition of the past by the German- Polish cooperation in the European Union will overcome, as it requires the least BdV Charter of 1950. "

second "As president of the Federation of displaced persons, I confess that my association is indeed a victim of association, but hundreds of thousands its distributors, before anything but merely were "friendly neighbors" so that worst was expected, just the expulsion of the innocent with the guilty. And I confess that had my family in Hitler's "West Prussia" look anywhere, because they did not come until 1941 in the wake of the criminal Germanization to Poland. "

on the admission of this bitter truth are Polish and German. Instead, think women Steinbach now public and self-pity about whether she waived the Foundation office, accompanied by the BdV campaign with the false claim that the "blackmailed Federal Government of Poland" will stir up . This Mrs. Steinbach and BdV anti-Polish and anti-German feelings hurt reconciliation. Mrs Merkel is not "blackmailed" , but will just have memorial services without the Polish government and my applause when she notes, despite all the criticism of Steinbach nomination without that Mrs Steinbach corrected.

Share your campaign is not just one, but shows the learning process related, because it needs for a liberal Europe, where German and Polish can live together without rancor.

Sincerely, Mark S. Rabago
>> discussion

Monday, February 16, 2009

Radio Shack Headphone Extensions

Adversaries promote censorship child abuse?

published today, the CDU politician Ilse Falk a press release under the title "cross fire against blocking access irresponsible".

I urge all lovers of information and freedom of expression on the now express loudly against censorship.

Very simple as that, for example, by saying The sellers of such press releases friendly opinion. This may be the case under ilse.falk @ bundestag.de .

submitted my mail as an example:

Dear Madame,

I am following with great interest the debate about the wife of der Leyen proposed Internet censorship to protect children. Cross

you have expressed today in a press release that a discussion of censorship, "the plans of Federal Family Minister von der Leyen [...], this bustle put an end," would.

Please explain to me how censorship helps even one abused child.

What would really help a consistent and immediate prosecution of manufacturers and distributors would be this perverse content. If you really want to protect children, then Germany needs no censorship, but pro-active, well-funded investigators.
It is a fact that the overwhelming Number of servers with child pornography in Western countries with well-functioning jurisdiction are. So there is no reason to censor structure build in our country before were not used to take all legitimate means the polluters.

Or deny that detention of the polluter is infinitely more effective than a small technical hurdle for the viewer?

I plan in the years to become a father himself. And I can assure you and your entire group that I do not want to raise my children in a country in which the information and opinion is censored.

on your personal response I'm very excited.

Sincerely
-
John Schöck


the last sentence of (not very strong arguments) press release is also interesting:
It can not be that Germany should not be possible, which other European countries since years of practice with success.

Someone should explain to Madame nor that for example, in Sweden almost only legal content will be filtered.
Great success, really.

Edit: This one matching items from netzpolitik.org .

Friday, February 6, 2009

10weeks Baby Sounds Congested In Throat

thoughts on Internet censorship and child pornography

Inspired in particular by sending Chaos Radio # 142 - The Family Internet , I have my thoughts on child pornography filter to Mrs von der Leyen (discussed for example in Spielgel Online order to get rid of us.

The "child" in the name
call in the proposal of Mrs. von der Leyen, the word "access block" very often, the word "censorship" but never on when I made Meyer may quote's Encyclopedia .
state surveillance and repression of publications in print and audiovisual media
The corresponding Wikipedia article also includes control speaks of the personal information of traffic, but the same language.
Since most voters respond well to censorship as allergic to something they do not know, can be recognized by the wording already covering up the underlying intention of the politicians (in) to the censorship of intent.

What really matters
Why should we ban child pornography at all? Easily carry off, because children are abused in the production and mental (in this case even harder physical) damage. Of course, such as banning it no one will complain.
Why are there really still no clear definition of what counts as child pornography and handled no clear guidelines as to the manufacturers and distributors is?
apply different policies in different states, rather than federal or even EU-wide uniform criminal agencies to use the pigs to produce something like creating justice and einzubuchten.
What a ridiculous because, technically effective censorship?
We need first clear legal basis and 2 willing to act investigators. That the provider should deliver the servers and backers immediately clear - because no company would risk being labeled as cooperators of child molesters.
What is not widely occurs rather
course, one can find many other bad sides on the initiative of the Minister for Family Affairs. Who else is interested could be some unpleasant content block, which reads like a who's who of powerful lobbies: the parties (especially conservative), media company (a convenient way of file sharing difficult, no matter whether this legal content can be blocked) or corporations for something have to cover up.
currently all we could, for example, the case German Railway vs. netzpolitik.org hernehmen . If Mr Mehdorn phone briefly with the BKA-Chief, then the page might have been on such a filter list - quite wrong. But
: Future scenarios usually do not help the argument, so I'll just leave it at that. The present facts speak for itself against the censorship.

on the experience of others to build
Mrs. von der Leyen, in its press release in other countries, "the locks work fine for years." Problems? It is not a problem if, as the example of Swedish filter list instead only child pornography and other illegal content is clearly and exclusively censored in particular legal content?
Most censored content (> 90%) in Sweden has nothing to do with illegality, but with "immoral" or indecent content. Gay porn are dependent on many not so good. In a free, liberal society, but no one has the right to censor anything legal because he himself does not fit!
It is therefore extremely problematic what happened in the filter model countries!

summary, I can only say that the plan to censor the Internet on a broad front is doomed to failure.

What about it? Yes!
I will write our family minister a short, terse letter in which I write to her very non-technical why censorship is bad and especially the fact that not a single child is protected - to strengthen, with the request but rather to the prosecution of the manufacturers.
After putting a paragraph inside what should really happen if they never want to miss out on a censorship.

you all I call this to do the same thing. Write an email, letter or fax - or phone calls with family and / or the Home Office. Tell your voter opinion.
In the "super election year" 2009, the politicians are certainly not inclined to scare voters too much. Makes clear to them that will not accept their censorship!

contact:
Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth
11 018 Berlin Tel

03018-555-0 03018-555-4400 Fax


poststelle@bmfsfj.bund.de or presse@bmfsfj.bund .
de
"direct" with Mrs interact von der Leyen:
http://www.direktzu.de/vonderleyen